This service runs realistic, scoped adversarial tests against your applications, external infrastructure, and cloud identity. The goal isn’t to generate the most findings—it’s to show how a determined attacker would chain what they find into risk your leadership cares about.
Designed for teams who want modern pentesting: realistic, narrative, and directly tied to attack surface and incident scenarios—not just a list of CVEs.
Traditional pentests often generate a long list of issues with little sense of which ones really matter. This service is structured around attack paths, impact, and how you’ll use the results in practice.
We focus on how weaknesses combine into real attack paths—entry, escalation, and impact— so you can see what actually moves risk.
We bring experience from cloud-first and identity-aware tradecraft, not just on-prem network penetration patterns.
Findings are only useful if your team can act on them. We build outputs that plug into your existing workflows.
We scope the engagement around what matters most—applications, external assets, or cloud identity—and run focused tests that simulate how a real attacker would operate within those boundaries.
We collaboratively define objectives, in-scope systems, and constraints so the test is realistic, safe, and aligned with your risk questions.
We execute against the agreed scope using a blend of manual techniques, automation, and tooling, focused on chaining weaknesses together.
We provide a narrative report, a structured findings list, and support for remediation validation where needed.
We produce artifacts that give engineers what they need to fix issues and give leadership the story they need to understand risk and progress.
A story of how we approached the environment, what we found, and how those issues could have been leveraged in practice.
A detailed findings list with severity, impact, reproduction steps, and evidence suitable for ticketing systems and engineering work.
Practical recommendations that prioritize risk reduction and are sensitive to real-world constraints and dependencies.
Follow-up testing of critical fixes to confirm that key issues have been resolved and to update the overall risk picture.
A good fit for teams who value realistic testing over checkbox pentests, and who want to integrate results into broader attack surface and incident readiness work.
Leaders who want pentest results that can be used in planning, not just filed away after a single meeting.
Teams releasing or evolving critical applications who want focused feedback on how they hold up under modern offensive techniques.
Environments where cloud identity, M365/Entra, and SaaS integrations play a central role in how attackers could move.